2/28/2020 |
Linda |
McGinnis |
Economist, Member Governor's Climate Action Commission, Concerned Citizen |
South Burlington |
Vermont |
For the past decade, I have been deeply involved in developing concrete policy and investment solutions to address climate change in Vermont in a manner that can both contribute to our economy and... read more For the past decade, I have been deeply involved in developing concrete policy and investment solutions to address climate change in Vermont in a manner that can both contribute to our economy and ensure affordability for its citizens. I am an economist with 30 years experience in this field (20 at the World Bank), a core member of Governor Scott's Climate Action Commission, a member of VCRD's Climate Economy Action Team, and a Senior Fellow at the Energy Action Network (advising on the recent publication of "Cap and Invest: A Review of Policy, Design, and Models and their applicability in Vermont").
I say all of this because I do not come to this recommendation lightly. The decision to join TCI is a big one and deserves careful consideration. Having studied this question extensively over the past several years, not only in Vermont but also in a number of other jurisdictions, I can say unequivocally that joining TCI is the most fundamental way for Vermont to make genuine progress in meeting our energy, climate, economic and affordability goals.
TCI presents a unique opportunity to focus on the single greatest source of greenhouse gas emissions in Vermont, and the one that keeps GROWING - transportation - in a way that builds on the success of our nation's first successful Cap and Invest program (RGGI - started under Jim Douglas), and in a way that generates the revenue needed to invest in clean transportation solutions that focus on those who need it most. RGGI allowed Vermont to join others in the region to focus on dramatically reducing BOTH greenhouse gas emissions (by 40%) in the electric sector while ALSO reducing consumer costs. Vermont has strategically invested the revenues raised from RGGI, directing the $2 million annually into weatherization programs that help Vermonters stop wasting energy and save money. That is good for our environment, our economy AND for affordability. But it only covers the electric sector, which accounts for only about 10% of our overall GHG emissions. TCI would focus on the elephant in the room - our vehicles - which account for 44% of our emissions, and is growing rather than declining.
Importantly, by joining TCI, Vermont would not have to go it alone. Like RGGI, we would join others who have already committed to reducing their carbon pollution, thereby increasing the impact of emissions reduction AND the ability to generate revenue to invest in the systemic changes that need to occur in the transportation sector to improve access and electrification. In fact if we DO go it alone by NOT joining TCI, we would be putting ourselves in jeopardy by cutting off a substantial source of revenue that we desperately need to address fundamental issues of access and equity in transportation that we currently face.
Research shows that no jurisdiction (State, region, country) in the world has made the progress needed to reach significant GHG reductions without some form of either Cap and Invest or carbon pricing policy in place. By capping pollution, we can guarantee the pace at which our progress can be made, while allowing the participating entities to decide on their own how to reduce their emissions. When looking at successful examples of Cap and Invest in the US and Canada (e.g.,RGGI, California and Quebec), it is clear that each has demonstrated that a triple win is possible: reduced emissions, increased economic output (compared to non-participating jurisdictions) and revenue that can equitably accelerate the transition to a clean energy economy.
Finally, we all know that there are insufficient revenues available in our current budget to address the issues of access and equity in the transportation sector, and certainly not enough to electrify the sector at the pace needed to reach our climate goals. We continue to place our most vulnerable citizens - our children - on diesel-emitting schoolbuses every day, causing increasing levels of health issues and pollution. Our rural population has little to no access to public transit. Our low- and middle- income population cannot afford to switch to electric vehicles. TCI offers the possibility of generating additional revenues to address some of these critical issues while also reducing our collective climate pollution.
I am grateful for all the effort that Vermont has put into the discussions surrounding TCI so far. I am also grateful to the Scott administration for creating a Climate Action Commission which strongly recommended joining a Cap and Invest program for the energy sectors not yet covered by RGGI. Now is the time to act on all the important groundwork that has been laid. I urge Vermont to join others who are actually doing something concrete to make a difference for our future. We know this type of policy works. Please do it.
There is no doubt that climate change is the single biggest threat to our economy, to affordability, to our very survival. I notice the changes around me each and every day, and it breaks my heart to think of what we are leaving to our children. I hear them talking about how irresponsible it would be for them to bring children into this world, how they see the window closing in on them. We all know the time is short, and the time to act is now. So let's do it. |
- |
2/28/2020 |
Kevin |
Downey |
Retired |
Wilmington |
Vermont |
If the States in this Initiative are serious about our commitments to reduce our CO2 emissions, the TCI must include incentives or tax rebates for the oldest of all the Greens, geothermal. It has... read more If the States in this Initiative are serious about our commitments to reduce our CO2 emissions, the TCI must include incentives or tax rebates for the oldest of all the Greens, geothermal. It has been around since the 1950's and very few people are even aware of it. I installed a geothermal heating system back in '08 and it's been paid for since 2018 with savings from zero gas deliveries over that time. New construction would be the easiest target for incentives, as the wells needed for the system could be drilled within the home's or business's building footprint. Retrofits are a bit harder(that is what I had to do), but they could be popular too with incentives to change from fossils. Please consider this important system type when finalizing this important Bill. Thank-you.
Sincerely,
Kevin Downey |
- |
2/28/2020 |
Jennifer |
Skinder |
Community Member |
Montpelier |
Vermont |
TCI is not nearly ambitious enough given the scale of the climate emergency. However, if specific policies are clearly defined by TCI it will provide a start in the right direction. Given that... read more TCI is not nearly ambitious enough given the scale of the climate emergency. However, if specific policies are clearly defined by TCI it will provide a start in the right direction. Given that Vermont gets all of our fossil fuels from other states, we should clearly join TCI, but must create policy that ensures equity for lower-income and rural Vermonters.
Vermont TCI should include:
-A mechanism to mitigate the impacts of TCI on low-income populations in rural areas with acknolwedgment that rural consumers must use more fossil fuels in order to get to work and commerce centers
-Higher EV and renewable energy rebates for low-income residents
-Increased weatherization funding for low and moderate income Vermonters and access to renewable energy sources via community solar development
-Development of safe roads for biking and walking, and focus on smart growth centers
-Investment in agricultural and natural responses to the climate emergency including carbon farming and forest health, acknowledging the impact of higher fuel rates on farmers, sugarmakers and others who work in agricultural and forestry professions
-Investment of TCI funds in clean energy, energy efficiency, and more robust public transportation to expand career opportunities and make jobs more accessible. The Vermont Green New Deal aims to do this, and is an essential part of all Vermont climate legislation. |
- |
2/28/2020 |
Jacob |
Flanigan |
Vermont resident |
Burlington |
Vermont |
This looks like a no brainier. Let's do it already read more This looks like a no brainier. Let's do it already |
- |
2/28/2020 |
MALCOLM |
FITZPATRICK |
Vermont |
Braintree |
Vermont |
TCI Comments 2.28.20
I believe that we are not doing enough to address climate change. Whether TCI will accomplish the intended results is very uncertain. For example, expecting electric... read more TCI Comments 2.28.20
I believe that we are not doing enough to address climate change. Whether TCI will accomplish the intended results is very uncertain. For example, expecting electric vehicles to significantly reduce climate change gases [cgc] is not certain, since it depends on the energy source of the electric recharge, which is dependent on the time of the 24-hr day cycle. The most efficient recharge would come directly [I.e., direct current] from a solar panel. However, for various bureaucratic reasons this cannot be done.
Uncertainty is also caused by the fact that major fracking is occurring across the US, except the east coast itself and New England. This fracking is producing significant cgs, which are carried eastward, and northerly, by the predominant air flows. TCI will do nothing to address this problem from fracking, as well as the other problems from fracking.
Needed is a comprehensive model of how to address not only climate change but also create sustainability. This model has to demonstrate how the collective “we” can move society in a short period of time from a consumptive society to a sustainable one, with low carbon waste gases. It will address social and environmental justice, by moving each of us higher on the Maslow model, resulting in a culture that has a higher quality of life for all.
|
TCI Comments 2.28.20.pdf |
2/28/2020 |
Mark |
Kennedy |
Mr. |
South Hero |
Vermont |
Transportation is Vermont's largest contributor to carbon emissions, so focusing particularly on reducing reliance on fossil fuel power transportation is particularly relevant and important... read more Transportation is Vermont's largest contributor to carbon emissions, so focusing particularly on reducing reliance on fossil fuel power transportation is particularly relevant and important for Vermont. I urge joining and participating in the TCI. |
- |
2/28/2020 |
Anna Rose |
Benson |
Vermont citizen |
Weybridge |
Vermont |
We say Yes to this proposal.
It is a good start and shows good intention.
We must work together, we must be serious and effective.
Good work. We say Yes to this proposal.
It is a good start and shows good intention.
We must work together, we must be serious and effective.
Good work. |
- |
2/28/2020 |
Sonia |
DeYoung |
University of Vermont |
Burlington |
Vermont |
Please, please forge ahead with this initiative! This country is LONG overdue for an overhaul of transportation. Getting between cities in many places in the Northeast is far slower by public... read more Please, please forge ahead with this initiative! This country is LONG overdue for an overhaul of transportation. Getting between cities in many places in the Northeast is far slower by public transit than by car. This shouldn't be the case. Public transit should be an appealing alternative, not a last resort. If any attempt is going to be made to prevent a climate crisis, it must include a new system of transportation - one that includes enhancing old transit systems and building new ones. |
- |
2/28/2020 |
sarah |
reeves |
First Universalist Society of Hartland, VT |
Norwich |
Vermont |
As a concerned citizen and coordinator of the Conference “Responding to the Climate Crisis with 2020 Vision,” and its Follow Up Meeting, held on January 11th and Feb. 9th, I have become... read more As a concerned citizen and coordinator of the Conference “Responding to the Climate Crisis with 2020 Vision,” and its Follow Up Meeting, held on January 11th and Feb. 9th, I have become increasingly aware of the devastation Climate Change is already causing to our planet and the scientific basis that grounds analyses of its impending destruction of the world as we know it, unless we take dramatic action, at least by 2030. We now know that the transportation sector is one of the highest contributors of carbon emissions in the atmosphere, almost 50% in Vermont, the major cause of this crisis.
Thus, I urge Vermont to participate in the Transportation and Climate Initiative so that all Vermonters, and residents in the other states involved can “get where they need to go,” and not pollute the planet irreparably.
Vermont, like other states, desperately needs additional funding to create innovative, equitable transportation options for all, including seniors/people with disabilities/people with low incomes, for whom transportation costs and accessibility are an added burden. TCI can provide this support.
As you know, Vermont’s participation in a cap and invest program is not new. Under Governor Jim Douglas, Vermont joined the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) in 2008. This cap and invest program covers the electric sector in the Northeast, and it has proven very successful, reducing consumer costs and carbon pollution from the power sector by 40%.
Vermont has strategically invested the revenues raised from RGGI, directing the $2 million annually into weatherization programs that help Vermonters stop wasting energy and save money. We know this type of project works — there is no excuse not to adopt TCI as well.
TCI provides the opportunity to tackle the biggest problem of our day — climate change — by reducing emissions in our state’s most carbon-intensive sector, while diverting funds into much-needed transportation infrastructure that will benefit all.
Let’s seize this opportunity to make monumental progress in confronting this crisis, before it’s really too late.
Thank you for reading this comments. May your decision be one that benefits us all and our home, our planet . |
- |
2/28/2020 |
Kevin |
Ellicks |
Middlebury College |
Middlebury |
Vermont |
TCI Public Comment
Kevin Ellicks
2/26/20
As an environmental science student at Middlebury College, topics raised and discussed in class are often specific to Vermont and... read more TCI Public Comment
Kevin Ellicks
2/26/20
As an environmental science student at Middlebury College, topics raised and discussed in class are often specific to Vermont and nearby areas. This semester, I am participating in a seminar concerning sustainable transportation in Vermont and its relation to accessibility, participation, and independence. Clearly then, the Transportation Climate Initiative is of particular relevance to my coursework.
The effects of climate change are becoming increasingly visible in Vermont and across the world. If the general population continues living out our lifestyles without enacting significant change, climate-related occurrences will only increase in severity and frequency. The Transportation Climate Initiative posits measures to reduce the pollution stemming from the transportation sector across the Upper South Atlantic, Mid Atlantic, and North Eastern states, more specifically, from Virginia to Maine. As the transportation sector accounts for 43% of carbon pollution in this TCI region, clearly efforts to reduce transportation pollution will coincidingly reduce carbon pollution. In that sense, I support the TCI’s initiative to address such a considerable contributor to pollution and climate change.
Given the current trajectory of climate change, the TCI is an important undertaking, yet it is far from a perfect plan of action. In the case of Vermont, a state with an extensive rural population, sustainable public transportation is often inaccessible or inconvenient to the point of irrelevance. Thus, much of the rural population of Vermont is left to its own devices to achieve mobility, which often leads to increased vehicle travel and carbon dioxide emissions. Coupled with the prevalence of poverty in rural Vermont, the increased cost of gasoline put forth by the TCI stands to leave low-income Vermonters unable to afford the gasoline that many rely on for transportation. This outcome must be avoided; therefore, the TCI must incorporate measures to ensure a just and equitable transition for impoverished Vermonters and those disproportionately affected by climate change, characteristics that are often in direct correlation to one another.
Prior to enacting the TCI, the Vermont government must ensure that rural populations will have access to transportation and that transportation will be increasingly sustainable to mitigate our current climate trajectory. As we strive to reduce vehicle miles travelled per person and emissions stemming from transportation, public transport must be made accessible to rural populations that are already disproportionately bearing the effects of climate change. Alternate modes of transport, like electric vehicles (EVs), allow a person to maintain their independence while also reducing polluting emissions. Incentives are in place to make EVs more obtainable, yet these incentives do not go far enough to make EVs available to Vermonters living in poverty.
The aspect of the TCI that I find most exciting is the potential for developing feedback loops that continually invest the profits generated from the TCI into sustainable transportation, leading to the continued decreasing of pollution from the transportation sector. The potential for an exponential process is encouraging as even initial small steps can snowball into a continued reduction of carbon dioxide emissions. Therefore, I recommend easing into the TCI to avoid jeopardizing the access of impoverished populations in Vermont to the gasoline that many have come to rely on for mobility via personal vehicles. If an abrupt transition to the TCI occurs, rural Vermonters that are unable to afford the increased prices stand to be isolated with no means of mobility, similar to the aftermath of Hurricane Irene.
Furthermore, those working to implement the TCI ought to take more measures to increase the accessibility of the document itself. Even if Vermonters are aware of the TCI and have access to related documents, the language of the TCI Memoriam of Understanding is dense and difficult to understand. The potential for storytelling and graphic representation as effective ways to communicate data is immense and can prove to be an effective means of garnering support for the TCI. As we watch states such as New Hampshire decline to participate in the TCI, it is imperative that efforts to increase public support are intensified.
The TCI represents a great opportunity to generate funding for increased accessibility to public transport, greater incentives for EVs to those that need more financial assistance, and the bettering of sustainable transportation infrastructure. It would be unjust to price rural populations out of purchasing the gasoline that many rely on, yet it would also be unjust to not enact change and continue to let rural communities bear the brunt of the impacts of climate change. Careful consideration of the impacts of the TCI, especially on rural populations, will allow for a just transition towards a more sustainable future.
|
- |
2/28/2020 |
Elizabeth |
Parker |
Sustainable Montpelier Coalition |
Montpelier |
Vermont |
It is imperative that we adopt TCI. Because of the way that Vermont acquires fuel from surrounding states which will be increasing the cost of Vermont's fuel. It is best to join TCI and... read more It is imperative that we adopt TCI. Because of the way that Vermont acquires fuel from surrounding states which will be increasing the cost of Vermont's fuel. It is best to join TCI and receive the monetary benefits of the program to allow Vermont to invest in new programs that will further reduce our carbon footprint. |
- |
2/28/2020 |
Kevin |
OKeefe |
350 vt |
bratt |
Vermont |
In May of 2018 the price of a gallon of gasoline was $2.90. That year the economy grew by 3%. The stock market was booming and the great Recession was in the rear view mirror of most Americans.... read more In May of 2018 the price of a gallon of gasoline was $2.90. That year the economy grew by 3%. The stock market was booming and the great Recession was in the rear view mirror of most Americans.
It is now 2020 (an election year) and Phil Scott is reluctant to address climate change solutions. As he recently stated he was, “not looking to come out with something dramatic.”
According to VT. Digger, “Some Republicans have raised concerns about the 12-state Transportation Climate Initiative (TCI), and called its system of fuel pricing a ‘carbon tax.’ Under the agreement, which would include Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic states, fuel prices could rise by as much as 17 cents per gallon.”
The Transportation and Climate Initiative (TCI) describes itself as a bi-partisan, “regional collaboration of 12 Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states and the District of Columbia that seeks to improve transportation, develop the clean energy economy and reduce carbon emissions from the transportation sector. The participating states are: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Virginia.”
With all due respect Mr. Scott I’d be more than happy to pay $3 a gallon for gasoline if I knew that extra revenue was addressing long-term commitment to climate change initiatives. I suspect that many of the 76% of Vermonters who support real action on this vital issue might also be willing to tolerate this increase.
It wasn’t until gasoline went over $4 a gallon Vermont in 2011 that myself and many of my neighbors started changing our habits and to car pool and find alternatives to our gas guzzling ways. Good governance, in this instance, is about applying force on the market to encourage consumers to take climate change as the primary issue it is. What good is an affordable Vermont in a world that burns?
Vermont should be leading these 12 states not putting the brakes on real change and action. |
- |
2/28/2020 |
Anne |
D'Olivo |
Mrs. |
Manchester Center |
Vermont |
The TCI makes a lot of sense for Vermont and we need to get this through the state house as soon as possible in order to meet the 2020 deadline and put it into effect in 2022. Time is of the... read more The TCI makes a lot of sense for Vermont and we need to get this through the state house as soon as possible in order to meet the 2020 deadline and put it into effect in 2022. Time is of the essence. The TCI is equitable and will take into consideration the frontlines communities in Vermont. It is fair to the fossil fuel companies who will transition to a Cap and Invest program gradually. It allows Vermont to be part of a regional initiative with other NE states and by doing so, will receive monies to help those who most need it. I say "yes" to the TCI.
|
- |
2/28/2020 |
Andy |
Robinson |
Andy Robinson Consulting LLC |
Plainfield |
Vermont |
As the owner of a Vermont-based business with clients around the country, I strongly support the TCI. It's a big step toward reducing our carbon emissions and also makes economic sense... read more As the owner of a Vermont-based business with clients around the country, I strongly support the TCI. It's a big step toward reducing our carbon emissions and also makes economic sense because:
1. We import 100% of our gas, propane, and heating oil from outside of Vermont. Many of those states will join TCI and then pass the costs to consumers further down the line, including in Vermont. If we don't join, then we're stuck with the costs without receiving any of the benefits.
2. About a quarter of fossil fuels sold in Vermont are purchased by tourists and other travelers. TCI proceeds will be distributed based on fuel sales within each state, so we will receive back more in revenues than Vermonters contribute.
Note to Governor Scott: This is an opportunity to earn more than we spend and use that money to support the Vermonters who need it the most. You have often encouraged a regional approach to climate change -- well, this is it. It's a rational, thoughtful, equitable, and economically valid solution. I urge your support.
|
- |
2/28/2020 |
Karen |
Saunders |
PhD candidate, Environmental Studies, Antioch University New England; also a resident of Brattleboro, Vermont |
Brattleboro |
Vermont |
I urge that Vermont participate in the Transportation and Climate Initiative as a step toward reducing our transportation carbon footprint. We may be a small state, but we do have an impact, and... read more I urge that Vermont participate in the Transportation and Climate Initiative as a step toward reducing our transportation carbon footprint. We may be a small state, but we do have an impact, and with 44% of our carbon emissions coming from transportation, this is a critically important step.
Traveling regularly to Keene, NH, I am constantly aware of the insufficiency of our public transportation system. If we had buses traveling between Brattleboro and Keene, I would be taking them. TCI could mean that all of us would have better public transportation infrastructure, and fewer of us would have cars on the road.
I'm aware that there is resistance to TCI because of the burden that increased prices on gas would put on poorer Vermonters, who often must drive to jobs that are often far from home, and who can't afford to buy an electric vehicle, even with incentives. If done right, TCI can ease these issues, rather than becoming an added burden for poor Vermonters. I urge that funds received by Vermont through TCI be directed into programs that help poor Vermonters with transportation needs. This means that public transportation should be treated as a public good and be free or very inexpensive, incentives for fuel efficient cars should be means-weighted enough so that someone who is driving a third-hand gas-guzzler can afford to replace it. Vermonters with accessibility needs (who are often among the poorest of us) must also have their needs put foremost, and accessibility should be a primary consideration in building out new transportation infrastructure.
Again, I urge that Vermont formally join TCI, and take this critically important step toward a cleaner energy future and an improved transportation infrastructure that will benefit us all.
Sincerely,
Karen Saunders
|
- |
2/28/2020 |
Peter |
Duval |
Peter Duval |
Underhill |
Vermont |
I participated in Vermont Public Service Board's Docket 5611, an investigation into environmental externalities -- in the early 1990s. The need for a cross-sector framework for regulating... read more I participated in Vermont Public Service Board's Docket 5611, an investigation into environmental externalities -- in the early 1990s. The need for a cross-sector framework for regulating greenhouse gas emissions was identified during the investigative phase of the docket. Emission allowance auction was one of several approaches to regulation that was considered. It was an appealing, market-based approach well-suited for a period of utility restructuring.
The TCI helps establish firm limits on greenhouse gas emissions while allowing flexibility in meeting the limits. It is three decades too late, but late is better than never. That the TCI only covers the transportation sector is a disappointment, but too narrow is better than not at all.
|
- |
2/28/2020 |
Carl |
Martin |
Norwich U |
Montpelier |
Vermont |
The benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions cannot ultimately be fiscally quantified, as these include protecting biodiversity and human well-being. Nonetheless, the TCI’s first-decade... read more The benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions cannot ultimately be fiscally quantified, as these include protecting biodiversity and human well-being. Nonetheless, the TCI’s first-decade regional benefits include (1) increases in GDP, disposable personal income (DPI), and employment, (2) better public health from cleaner air valued at $3 – $10 billion, and (3) a 20 – 25% reduction in greenhouse gas pollution from cars and trucks; while the VT-specific benefits include (1) $18 - $80 million in annual revenues to invest in low-carbon transportation options, (2) more money from the program each year than Vermonters contribute, and (3) the opportunity to make the state more affordable for low-income and rural Vermonters by lessening dependence on imported, polluting and expensive fossil fuels. |
- |
2/28/2020 |
Tara |
Santi |
Middlebury College |
Middlebury |
Vermont |
As a student currently working on transportation concerns in Middlebury, I was very curious to read the Memorandum of Understanding put forward by the Transportation and Climate Initiative (TCI... read more As a student currently working on transportation concerns in Middlebury, I was very curious to read the Memorandum of Understanding put forward by the Transportation and Climate Initiative (TCI). The TCI proposes the establishment of a regional program composed of 12 states and Washington, D.C., all committing to transition to a low-carbon, sustainable transportation sector through the implementation of a regional cap-and-invest program.
I agree with the TCI’s emphasis on cleaning up the transportation sector. If we’re going to act on climate change, we need to act fast. The 2018 IPCC report gave us twelve years (now ten) to cut global greenhouse gas emissions 45% below 2010 levels to have any hope of limiting warming beyond 1.5C. The recent ratification of the Global Warming Solutions Act (H.688) by the Vermont House is a promising start to what will hopefully be decisive, thoughtful, and socially-just continued action by the Vermont government to curb emissions.
The TCI is another step forward for Vermont, one unique in that it specifically tackles transportation, which makes up nearly half of the state’s current climate pollution. Curbing transportation emissions is a must if Vermont seeks to meet our commitment to the 2015 Paris Climate Accord by 2025. So yes, let’s join the TCI…BUT…
It MUST fully center the needs and rights of low income and working-class Vermonters in a just transition to a renewable energy-powered transportation future.
This is the question I always want to ask when considering climate legislation: who is going to be squeezed? Implementing a cap-and-invest system with a declining cap certainly puts the pressure on fuel suppliers, but that pressure is in part passed off to Vermonters filling up their tanks at the gas station. For some, the TCI will help lower the cost of transitioning to an electric vehicle (EV) and make it more feasible with rural electrification. But what about those Vermonters who simply do not have the budget for a new vehicle, whether or not it’s electric and whether or not the cost is lowered?
More accessible to some does not mean accessible to all.
This is the very issue the Vermont legislature hesitated on last session with a carbon tax proposal. House Speaker Mitzi Johnson said she can’t see a “straight-up carbon tax” being viable without already having a better public transportation system in rural areas. Isn’t that the same problem we see in the TCI, that putting a cap on carbon allowances might ultimately hurt rural and working-class Vermonters the most? The difference being that the TCI hides behind hopes of EV incentives and electric charging stations that simply do not make sense for many Vermonters.
To its credit, the TCI does include a clause on equity:
“BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Signatory Jurisdictions will work with communities to ensure that the benefits of a cap-and-invest program flow equitably to communities that are underserved by clean transportation alternatives, disproportionately bear the costs of the current transportation system, or suffer disproportionate impacts of vehicular pollution and climate change”
I’m glad that there is recognition of the disproportionate costs of transportation to vulnerable groups, but I would hope to see social and community justice front and center of Vermont’s implementation of the TCI, rather than relegated to a side note.
I’ve experienced firsthand the frustrations of working-class people facing rising fuel prices when I lived in Bordeaux, France during the beginning of the yellow vest protest movement in November 2018. The high price of gas and a high of living in general hit the French middle and working-classes the hardest, especially in rural and peri-urban areas. People across the country demonstrated for weeks calling for lower fuel taxes, a solidarity tax on wealth, and a minimum wage increase, among other demands. I can’t help but draw some, albeit limited, parallels to Vermont. The unrest in France is a stark example of what happens when governments enact climate legislation without fully considering and addressing the needs of those who are currently the most dependent on the system the way it is now. Vermonters are perhaps not numerous enough to pressure their government the way that French protesters did, which gives legislators here all the more responsibility to be proactive about the way they implement any new transportation legislation.
Vermont could benefit greatly from increased electrification, expanded and improved public transportation, and smart development. That’s why I’m saying yes to Vermont participating in the TCI…BUT doing so by centering the needs of low income and working-class Vermonters. I don’t pretend to know the perfect solution, but I do encourage those making the decisions to find ways to minimize the burdens placed on individuals and households and maximize their ability to lead a dignified life. |
- |
2/28/2020 |
Roger |
Joslin |
Real Estate Broker |
North Concord |
Vermont |
THERE IS NO CLIMATE CRISIS!!! There is ample evidence that CO2 cannot cause warming and does not cause warming. The global temperatures have not risen by more than 1 degree C in the last 100... read more THERE IS NO CLIMATE CRISIS!!! There is ample evidence that CO2 cannot cause warming and does not cause warming. The global temperatures have not risen by more than 1 degree C in the last 100 years. The numbers have been manipulated to fit the IPCC agenda. Michael Mann was defeated in Canadian court because he wouldn't provide the data to prove his "hockey stick graph" was not a fraud. 500 scientist from all over the world have sent a letter to the UN asking for a debate with their scientists regards their data. This is absolutely not settled science. |
- |
2/28/2020 |
Dirk Peter |
Luyckx |
Montpelier Energy Advisory Committee and Montpelier Transportation Infrastructure Committee |
Montpelier |
Vermont |
I strongly support Vermont signing on to the Transportation and Climate Initiative. It is clear that if we are going to meet our climate commitments (which we must for the future of the state and... read more I strongly support Vermont signing on to the Transportation and Climate Initiative. It is clear that if we are going to meet our climate commitments (which we must for the future of the state and the next generations) that we must address transportation climate pollution by increasing housing density in our cities, and supporting non-fossil fuel infrastructure including that for bicycles, pedestrians, trains, and electric vehicles, as well as increasing transportation options including on evenings and weekends so that families and individuals can truly go carfree. The Transportation and Climate Initiative is a good vehicle for helping us reduce carbon and meet our goals and will bring revenues to the state to build the needed infrastructure to replace a car-dependent and fossil-fuel dependent population. |
- |