TCI Regional Policy Design Stakeholder Submissions

We need more regulations to assist in attaining clean Air. We lived in Southern Calif when if you went into LA your eyes burned save it was so skinny you couldn't see much. Then they cleaned up that air. Car manufacturers want less polluting cars because their customers want that. Future generations will look back and judge the polluters who are ruining our earth for their own monetary profits.

You should read "The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels" by American energy theorist Alex Epstein, in which the author argues that, although sometimes labeled as "immoral," the use of fossil fuels dramatically improves the overall progress of humanity, and improves life expectancy and income. My senator Sheldon Whitehouse should also read "The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels."

Can we look into instituting similar programs on federal, state, or local levels similar to what California is doing?
http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/communications-and-outreach/publications/news-releases/2019/ccfa_190501_2019_017-pdf.pdf?la=en
a sort of cash for clunkers type program for lower income citizens to encourage trading in ICE cars for plug ins.

I am writing today to express my support for a strong carbon pricing policy in the transportation sector.
As a mother of three, I am very concerned if we can turn around and take action on climate change in time to avert the worst effects on our kids and grandkids. Having lived in Europe for a long time, I follow their efforts to reign in green house gas emissions closely, and I am glad that in the US, states and cities are finally getting on board and taking regional initiatives of their own.

I am thrilled to hear that the Transportation Climate Initiative is developing a policy that would put a price on carbon for our transportation sector. I am grateful and very optimistic for this policy, as it is a bipartisan endeavor.
In order for the Mid-Atlantic and Northeastern states to achieve our necessary climate goal, pricing Carbon is a genial first step. The policy needs to
- put a price on carbon high enough to effectively decrease emissions (new technology enables higher efficiency, less consumption, but only if the old way gets more inconvenient or too expensive), and this price needs to be based on the latest science.
- Furthermore, the new policy needs to make sure that rural or low income populations are not hurt disproportionately.
The Citizens’ Climate Lobby has been working in a similar carbon pricing nation wide for years now. Please inquire how their model (clear, transparent pricing over 10 years, with the dividend distributed to all Americans equally) can inspire the new policy to be adopted by the TCI.
Thank you for taking my comments,
Adelheid Koepfer
35 Whiffle Tree Road
Wallingford, CT 06492

Connecticut’s transportation sector is the biggest single emitter of greenhouse gas emissions in the state at 38% of the total. This is a climate crisis, and we must immediately work to address the greatest challenge of our generation. Will TCI alone stop global warming? Of course not, but it is a valuable and urgent contribution.
Addressing greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles also means immediate health benefits for our most overburdened populations as a result of improved air quality and fewer emissions of localized pollutants responsible for cancer and respiratory and cardiovascular ailments, among other adverse health impacts. School busses are a perfect example: discontinuing diesel busses and replacing them with electric busses will directly benefit the health our school kids, just as EVs do in general. Please support and implement the transition to EV.
Please limit urban sprawling and road/ interstate expansion, and focus instead on centers for future development, as well as connecting rural areas via public transportation.

Raising gas prices does nothing but take food from working class families. We already pay excise tax every year on our cars which is supposed to keep our taxes down, we also already have taxes in the gas prices and toll plazas across the state. All of the revenue stream were designed to pay for road repairs. Now every year there seems to be a new bond for more money. Now the state is trying to force you I to a vehicle you can't afford. This is a bad idea in a group of bad ideas

Any increase in fuel prices would be disastrous to the Massachusetts commercial fishing fleet. The earth has increased in temperature 0.8 degrees Celsius since the 1800s. Charging working families more for fuel will do nothing to change the earth's temperature, but will take money away from our families and lower our standard of living.

Apologies for the late submission. The comments from Consumer Reports are provided at a file attachment. Thank you for the opportunity to comment, and for considering our input.
- Adam Winer, Consumer Reports

I encourage the development of pollution free energy for public transportation. Locally generated green energy will reduce air pollution, and will be less vulnerable to attacks from those who would harm our infrastructure.