5/11/2021 |
Gregory |
McHugo |
retired |
Strafford |
Vermont |
Vermont needs to take the lead among New England states in dealing with the transportation infrastructure. We need widespread and equitable access to transportation of many types, and we need to... read more Vermont needs to take the lead among New England states in dealing with the transportation infrastructure. We need widespread and equitable access to transportation of many types, and we need to develop it in a way that vastly reduces our reliance on fossil fuels. It's now or never. It's also time to insure that the legacy of the Scott administration is favorable to future generations. Please stop aligning with big business and do what is right for the people of Vermont. |
- |
5/12/2021 |
Lisa |
Huffman |
Virginia resident |
Charlottesville |
Virginia |
I am against Virginia joining the Transportation Climate Initiative. I believe it would have a negative impact on consumers and especially small businesses. I am against Virginia joining the Transportation Climate Initiative. I believe it would have a negative impact on consumers and especially small businesses. |
- |
5/12/2021 |
Jane |
Miller |
University of Virginia Health System |
Charlottesville |
Virginia |
Please, please, please raise gas taxes!!!! The higher the better so more people will stop supporting the ridiculous, WOKE, liberal agenda that continues to destroy this country! Please, please, please raise gas taxes!!!! The higher the better so more people will stop supporting the ridiculous, WOKE, liberal agenda that continues to destroy this country! |
- |
5/12/2021 |
Heyward |
Macdonald |
independent |
Charlottesville |
Virginia |
$.50 a gallon?
Come, now. Really? $.50 a gallon?
Come, now. Really? |
- |
5/13/2021 |
Deborah |
Pruett |
ACPS |
Charlottesville |
Virginia |
NO to Virginia joining TCI. The cost will be passed onto consumers, who ALWAYS are affected. Another tax would hurt the economy trying to get back. This tax will affect truckers which will then... read more NO to Virginia joining TCI. The cost will be passed onto consumers, who ALWAYS are affected. Another tax would hurt the economy trying to get back. This tax will affect truckers which will then raise the cost of EVERYTHING!
No! No! No! to TCI |
- |
5/15/2021 |
Elaine |
Fischer |
citizen |
Roanoke |
Virginia |
We ALL need Clean Air!
I call for the TCI-P Model Rule to include (1) a minimum investment amount to ensure overburdened and underserved communities in Virginia receive a greater-then-... read more We ALL need Clean Air!
I call for the TCI-P Model Rule to include (1) a minimum investment amount to ensure overburdened and underserved communities in Virginia receive a greater-then-proportional share of investments from the program, (2) integration of air quality commitments across Virginia, and (3) robust empowerment of Virginia's Equity Advisory Body. |
- |
5/16/2021 |
Philip |
Hosken |
Bio Engine Technology Ltd |
Redruth |
Iowa |
I'm not in Iowa but in the UK. Your form does not welcome overseas contributuions!
In the face of all the development of electric and hydrogen technology, here in the UK, we... read more I'm not in Iowa but in the UK. Your form does not welcome overseas contributuions!
In the face of all the development of electric and hydrogen technology, here in the UK, we have developed the simple, cheap Rankine Cycle engine to use bioethanol rocket fuel to produce the high torque required by HGVs and buses. It can, of course be used effectively in smaller vehicles but the greatest demand is as a power source for the larger and off-road vehicles. I don’t have to explain bioethanol to you, that the US is the world’s largest manufacturer and that the industry works at the behest of the oil companies. The two-cylinder engine may require some simple explanation and we’ll be pleased to answer queries.
The reference to rocket fuel is because, in WW2, the Germans bombed Britain with V2 (A4) rockets that travelled at a height of 128 miles at a speed of 3,500 mph fuelled by 75% bioethanol, the other 25% was water! Please ease up on natural gas, it’s far from clean.
Looking forward to hearing from you
See www.cleanclimate.co.uk
|
- |
6/6/2021 |
Russell |
Donnelly |
HPS |
Framingham |
Massachusetts |
I have just read that Conn. seems to be leaving the TCI process too.It seems that they are afraid that adding $.05-$.06 to the price of gas will be just too much .According to Wood Mackenzie and... read more I have just read that Conn. seems to be leaving the TCI process too.It seems that they are afraid that adding $.05-$.06 to the price of gas will be just too much .According to Wood Mackenzie and some other sites (international?)in order to have any hope of keeping global warming to 1.5 degree Celsius,the price of carbon has to move from $22 per ton to $150 per ton by 2030.That's roughly $1.25 more per gallon of gasoline.Big deal.But for Conn. adding a nickel more to the price of a gallon is too much.As far as I can see we are laboring to produce a mouse of a change,instead of an elephant. The whole premise of this initiative is flawed.It's based on the idea that magically by pressuring producers of gas and diesel on their carbon output they will somehow decrease it,provide funds to incentivize renewables for local groups,etc.,and it won't translate to higher prices at the pump which will hurt lower income groups. There are so many better ways to do this.Such as a carbon fee and dividend returned progressively. Or,we could apply the same tax policy we use for everything else in order to find money to fund desired ends.Do we use the Pigou theory of taxation? No,we use the Willy Sutton theory of taxation. Willy Sutton,the bank robber of the thirties,when asked why he robbed banks,he answered-that's where the money is. Now,regarding the federal income tax,we apply this principle.We tax the rich,because that's where the money is. So,if the goal is to move to a carbon free future,we should tax rich polluters.Tax those who choose to commute. So,anyone who can buy a new gasmobile car,in 2021,should pay $1000 for the privilege to pollute.In 2021.In 2022 he should pay $2000 per year.In 2023 he will pay $3000 per year ,and so on.O any car selling for more that $35,000,new. Use the money collected to buy ev school buses first. |
- |
6/15/2021 |
bill |
peabody |
fcta.org |
springfield |
Virginia |
Why not complete the Anna and Surrey nuke sites before raising taxes Why not complete the Anna and Surrey nuke sites before raising taxes |
- |
6/15/2021 |
Diane |
Ribble |
Citizen |
Salem |
Virginia |
I vote NO to TCI - this will put an unnecessary financial burden on Virginians ..our gas prices have already risen a dollar a gallon and we are in major inflation due to Current White House... read more I vote NO to TCI - this will put an unnecessary financial burden on Virginians ..our gas prices have already risen a dollar a gallon and we are in major inflation due to Current White House policies. Virginia does not need TCI -vote no! |
- |
7/27/2021 |
Matthew |
LeFluer |
Green Mountain Self-advocates |
Alburgh |
Vermont |
Greeting staff member of TCI my name is Matthew I'm a person with Learning disability. ( Autism spectrum ). People with disabilities around the United States of America need accessible... read more Greeting staff member of TCI my name is Matthew I'm a person with Learning disability. ( Autism spectrum ). People with disabilities around the United States of America need accessible affordable reliable transportation this includes public trains Transit school buses Etc because this is so important for us with disabilities moving forward with TCI meaning more accessibility options to people with disabilities living around the United States of America within 50 States. Plus it will help economic and economy throughout Rural America rural towns cities villages need meaningful and transformable innovation modernization upgrade Bridges roads and Technology, innovations ideals In these rural markets of America. Please continue on behalf of American people with disabilities continue supporting us all that need accessible affordable transportation throughout the United States of America Please continue the efforts on making America the great place to live, Work ,And Play. Thank you all for keeping us in your minds and we look forward on working together around transportation issues throughout the United States of America. |
- |
8/3/2021 |
Margaretha |
Eckhardt |
Retired |
Waltham |
Massachusetts |
Attractive, convenient public transportation is needed throughout the Boston area, which requires increased frequency and additional train and bus lines. I believe SMART growth principles can... read more Attractive, convenient public transportation is needed throughout the Boston area, which requires increased frequency and additional train and bus lines. I believe SMART growth principles can bring housing and business into a configuration in which shared transportation is more efficient. Maintenance and upgrade of bridges and tracks used by trains is critical. |
- |
8/5/2021 |
David |
LaFrance |
American |
Berlin |
Connecticut |
Please stop throwing more and more taxes on middle class families. We are all tired, we need tax breaks not yet another tax on top of already crazy high taxes on our transportation costs. There is... read more Please stop throwing more and more taxes on middle class families. We are all tired, we need tax breaks not yet another tax on top of already crazy high taxes on our transportation costs. There is no viable route to electric cars, charging takes too long, gasoline is the only viable energy solution for personal transport needs of the average middle class consumer. Just stop funding your pet projects on the backs of people that can not afford it. |
- |
8/16/2021 |
Raymond |
Daskoski |
Republican/conservative |
Chelsea |
Maine |
It's just another way/excuse to get money that can be spent recklessly. The Last thing Americans need is to have more or high taxes, this especially includes new taxes
read more It's just another way/excuse to get money that can be spent recklessly. The Last thing Americans need is to have more or high taxes, this especially includes new taxes
|
- |
9/7/2021 |
Kevin |
Tobin |
Independent |
Avon |
Connecticut |
The purchase of 'allowances' does not adequately serve the purpose of reducing emissions. This cost is simply passed down to the consumer; ultimately wreaking havoc on GDP. There needs... read more The purchase of 'allowances' does not adequately serve the purpose of reducing emissions. This cost is simply passed down to the consumer; ultimately wreaking havoc on GDP. There needs to be major tax 'incentives' to produce cleaner energy and reduce GHG. If 'clean energy' becomes synonymous with 'profitability', then the stated goals of this plan are much more likely to succeed. Simply incorporating additional costs only hurts the very people you're trying to protect and is not really an equitable solution on its own. There are many who do wish to 'go green', but the startup is simply too cost prohibitive. Please add financial INCENTIVES to this plan, as the money made from 'allowances' (over the course of inflation that comes with this type of activity) will ultimately end up being next to worthless. The fact is, we should have cut out GHG a LONG time ago. We are already overdue and the fact that corporations can just pay-up and that somehow makes it ok is an insult to our planet, voting citizens and our children. The earth doesn't work that way. 'Paid-for emissions' are still emissions. Greener energy should be a REQUIREMENT, at this point. Gas stations change their pricing constantly, and drivers who commute are not going to stop driving. Since, COVID, driving has even become many individuals full-time job. And electric vehicles provide no benefit to our environment if the electricity they use still comes from the burning of fossil fuels. Consumers still require energy. Added costs, simply get passed down to the end-users who have even less means to make an impact. Ultimately, change rests in the hands of the producers of that energy. As such, clean energy production should be mandated, if not strongly encouraged through credits and tax incentives. Simply taxing emissions, as we've already witnessed over the years, does absolutely NOTHING to produce the desired change this policy lays out. Please provide the 'carrot' AND 'the stick' to ensure our children have a habitable world to live in. |
- |
9/17/2021 |
John |
McGannon |
TVSU |
Westbrook |
Connecticut |
TCI-P is a smart, proactive, fair and innovative piece of legislation that will create jobs & require that polluters do their share to create accountability, economic and environmental... read more TCI-P is a smart, proactive, fair and innovative piece of legislation that will create jobs & require that polluters do their share to create accountability, economic and environmental justice. We should be proud to support TCI-P. Do your homework -- you'll see! It is NOT a tax on gasoline. Businesses support it, 70% of CT residents support it, and we all should let our state senators and legislative leaders know that we want to make our state a leader in fighting climate change and supporting just solutions! |
- |
9/30/2021 |
Kent |
A Bourgault |
republican |
Fitchburg |
Massachusetts |
I would like to submit my disapproval for the Commonwealth of Massachusett's participation in the TCI. read more I would like to submit my disapproval for the Commonwealth of Massachusett's participation in the TCI. |
- |
4/2/2021 |
David |
Stevenson |
Caesar Rodney Institute |
Lewes |
Delaware |
Please see attached file Please see attached file |
Comments on TCI Model Rule April 2021.pdf |
4/1/2021 |
Christopher |
Labosier |
Longwood University |
Farmville |
Virginia |
Please find the attached comments. Please find the attached comments. |
Labosier_CommentLetter_4-1-21.pdf |
3/31/2021 |
Leslie |
Bellas |
Citizen |
Oakland |
Maryland |
Please see the attached comment letter. Please see the attached comment letter. |
FINAL Comments on TCI-P_LB.pdf |