|
12/1/2019 |
Daniel |
Simard |
Park Bridge Properties, LLC |
Tewksbury |
Massachusetts |
We already rejected your gas tax.
In this age of “global warming” , I suggest you stick your proposal where the sun don’t shine !! We already rejected your gas tax.
In this age of “global warming” , I suggest you stick your proposal where the sun don’t shine !! |
- |
|
12/1/2019 |
Jeffrey |
Taveras |
Republican |
TEWKSBURY |
Massachusetts |
We do not need more taxes! Most of the money will apparently go to the inept and corrupt MBTA, which I ride every day. This will be pouring more money down a rat hole. As a scientist, I have... read more We do not need more taxes! Most of the money will apparently go to the inept and corrupt MBTA, which I ride every day. This will be pouring more money down a rat hole. As a scientist, I have serious questions about the whole global warming theory. We all agree that the earth is warming. The question is man responsible? There is plenty of scientific dissent to the theory, but the dissenting voices are suppressed by the media, who no longer feel the need to give light to ideas that contradict their political orthodoxy. Science is not science when it is politicized. The promoters of this theory would have everyone believe that all scientists agree that CO2 is the cause of global warming. In science, there is almost never complete consensus on anything. |
- |
|
12/24/2019 |
Peter |
Tympanick |
Resident |
Tewksbury |
Massachusetts |
I vote no for this tax. Just another scam to hide government spending I vote no for this tax. Just another scam to hide government spending |
- |
|
12/30/2019 |
Alec |
DiFruscia |
Massachusetts Taxpayer |
Tewksbury |
Massachusetts |
I oppose Massachusetts participating in the Transportation Climate Initiative.
The TCI will be paid for by working families and small businesses across Massachusetts in the form of... read more I oppose Massachusetts participating in the Transportation Climate Initiative.
The TCI will be paid for by working families and small businesses across Massachusetts in the form of a gas tax. The current proposal could see an additional five to 17 cents per gallon, and these costs will be passed down to consumers in more ways than one. Not only will it cost more to fill the gas tank, run errands, and pick up the kids from school, businesses will be forced to raise the prices of goods to cover the cost of this proposal.
In addition, living in a part of Massachusetts close to New Hampshire, consumers will take their money across the border. Instead of buying their gas in Massachusetts, consumers will go to New Hampshire (who has already opted out of this proposal) to buy gas, as well as other goods like groceries and lottery tickets, that they would usually buy in Massachusetts.
Despite its good intentions, the TCI’s effect on reducing carbon emissions will be marginal. Carbon emissions are already expected to fall in the next decade by at most 19%. The TCI will only see a reduction in carbon emissions between 1-6%.
Before imposing this new tax, the proposal should come for a vote before the legislature. Unilaterally levying a gas tax is not just bad practice, it’s bad policy. Massachusetts needs to take a hard look at the TCI before saddling Massachusetts families and businesses with new taxes. |
- |
|
1/12/2020 |
Paul |
Mucica |
Citizen |
Tewksbury |
Massachusetts |
Let's start with the obvious: This plan will punish anyone who has to drive to work, the farther the greater, and will simply fatten the coffers of the state legislature to waste in... read more Let's start with the obvious: This plan will punish anyone who has to drive to work, the farther the greater, and will simply fatten the coffers of the state legislature to waste in typically unimaginable ways. "Earmarks"? There is no such thing in this state, only the next black hole to pour our money into. Next, if it's such a great initiative, why are adjoining states fleeing from it like rats on a sinking ship? Third: Where will its appetite end? First, it's 17 cents, then a quarter, then...California here we come! If the state really wanted to affect climate change by enhancing public transportation, it would create a public transportation system that actually works consistently and efficiently, is accessible to citizens, and is reasonably priced. So far, every "initiative" has turned into a boondoggle...but a very lucrative one for the state's wallet. Please stop treating us as if we are so stupefied by letting you get away with your countless past indulgences that you think this is just another folder of b.s. you can slip under our door in the middle of the night. |
- |
|
1/13/2020 |
Michelle |
Ricard - Savastano |
Republican |
Tewksbury |
Massachusetts |
Massachusetts is trying to get more money out of the working class. You just picked up a bunch of revenue from selling marijuana. If you up the gas tax all the drivers are going to put the cost... read more Massachusetts is trying to get more money out of the working class. You just picked up a bunch of revenue from selling marijuana. If you up the gas tax all the drivers are going to put the cost onto the working class. we voted against a gas tax years earlier it means we still want no gas tax. All you people want to do is up your salaries and pensions in our backs. LEAVE US ALONE! NO GAS TAX. |
- |
|
1/20/2020 |
Danuta |
Radko |
Ms |
Tewksbury |
Massachusetts |
|
- |
|
1/30/2020 |
Francesco |
Catizone |
None |
Tewksbury |
Massachusetts |
Absolutely abhorrent. No one person or body should be allowed to unilaterally increase taxes (and this is a TAX) in this democratic system. The taxes on transportation are already ridiculous, and... read more Absolutely abhorrent. No one person or body should be allowed to unilaterally increase taxes (and this is a TAX) in this democratic system. The taxes on transportation are already ridiculous, and this state cannot seem to get it's act together. The TAX revenue from this bill will almost certainly be appropriated in the same manner as the taxes INTENDED to fix our roads. Well, just look at them. |
- |
|
12/18/2020 |
Paul |
Mucica |
Citizen |
Tewksbury |
Massachusetts |
A Commission with no one to be held accountable to? Increased taxes at any rate they feel is appropriate? Increased costs to all things "fossil," whether personally used or consumed by... read more A Commission with no one to be held accountable to? Increased taxes at any rate they feel is appropriate? Increased costs to all things "fossil," whether personally used or consumed by delivery to home or store? And at what benefit? Barely any...if any at all. This is, plain and simple, a way for an aggressive, out-of-control fear lobby to fund itself in the form of billions of dollars stolen from those already taxed beyond their means. It is another "feel good, do nothing" ploy, plain and simple. NO! NO!! NO!!! |
- |
|
2/26/2020 |
Phebe |
McCosker |
--None-- |
Thetford |
Vermont |
I was a member of the group in Thetford that drafted our town's Enhanced Energy Plan. I fully appreciate how hard it will be for small towns to meet the energy goal that Vermont has affirmed... read more I was a member of the group in Thetford that drafted our town's Enhanced Energy Plan. I fully appreciate how hard it will be for small towns to meet the energy goal that Vermont has affirmed: each town needs to be powered by 90% renewable energy from within its borders by 2050. The Transportation and Climate Initiative as one of the many actions needed to make that goal possible. |
- |
|
10/16/2020 |
Theresa |
Epp |
DHMC |
Thetford |
Vermont |
We need to stop hesitating to take control of our future. We need to stop hesitating to take control of our future. |
- |
|
1/12/2020 |
Mark |
Winston |
Old Caucasian Male |
Thomaston |
Maine |
Not interested. No thanks. Will vote against any attempt to add these kind of taxes, and those who support them.
Not interested. No thanks. Will vote against any attempt to add these kind of taxes, and those who support them.
|
- |
|
1/12/2020 |
Kat |
Keys |
Self employed |
Thomaston |
Maine |
I am against this plan. I drive all throughout Maine to help assist my disabled Mother and other family members spread over the state. And my job requires I drive out of state. I cannot be forced... read more I am against this plan. I drive all throughout Maine to help assist my disabled Mother and other family members spread over the state. And my job requires I drive out of state. I cannot be forced to drive an electric car. |
- |
|
10/25/2019 |
Kenneth |
Copp |
Businessman |
Thorndike |
Maine |
Since we know that 54% of carbon emission in Maine come from the transportation sector alone, this is reason enough to take immediate action to replace all combustion engine vehicles, both... read more Since we know that 54% of carbon emission in Maine come from the transportation sector alone, this is reason enough to take immediate action to replace all combustion engine vehicles, both commercial and private with clean and far more efficient all-electric versions as well as to build out the charging infrastructure to allow for seamless transportation that minimizes the transition from the convenience of time that we have enjoyed with the proliferation of fueling stations for internal combustion engines for so many years. We CAN do this! Without it, it will not be very convincing or compelling to the general populace for the rapid transformation of our means of transportation to a cleaner and brighter future. |
- |
|
2/25/2020 |
Kenneth |
Copp |
Citizens Climate Lobby |
Thorndike |
Maine |
We all are aware of the science of human-caused climate change and the climate crisis that is now upon us. Given the urgency of the hour, we need to make a war-time effort to stop the prolific... read more We all are aware of the science of human-caused climate change and the climate crisis that is now upon us. Given the urgency of the hour, we need to make a war-time effort to stop the prolific production of greenhouse gases and CO2 emissions. The fact that our transportation sector is one of the leading causes of this dangerous phenomenon clearly shows us that the reduction of CO2 and PM 2.5 particulates from all forms of internal combustion engine-driven vehicles is vital. The switch of all our public transportation vehicles, be they buses or trucks must be rapidly transformed into all-electric motor propulsion. And we don't have time to wait another 10-20 years! It needs to start now!
We have the technology and funds to do so. The cost to not do so and delay will be far more than if we act now. There are studies abroad that clearly show this. We also need to stop the production and sale of all internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles and heavily tax those still on the road. Gas subsidies to the big oil corporations need to end as well. If this were done, we would see a mass shift to electric vehicles by the populace in general, and car manufacturers would either convert to all electric-powered vehicles or cease to exist.
We're talking about the future of human life on this planet, let alone all the non-human species. This is serious, and if we really love our children, and our own well being, but especially the children and grandchildren in our lives, we will take this seriously and be willing to do what it takes to make the change. The sacrifices we are willing to make now will pay large dividens in the near future! |
- |
|
11/12/2019 |
Joe |
Capuzzo |
Independent |
Thornton |
New Hampshire |
Thumbs down on the TCI Policy it’s not good. Thumbs down on the TCI Policy it’s not good. |
- |
|
2/25/2020 |
Todd |
Dennis |
Resident of Vermont |
Tinmouth |
Vermont |
Hi,
I am a resident of Vermont and I am opposed to the creation of the TCI. I attended a meeting, one of several held around the state, where we were told that this regional... read more Hi,
I am a resident of Vermont and I am opposed to the creation of the TCI. I attended a meeting, one of several held around the state, where we were told that this regional compact was based on another successful regional compact, the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). We were lead to believe that RGGI was successful in it's mission and that TCI would be as well by building off these successes. In fact, RGGI has failed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions but instead has created a tax that emitters pay to emit greenhouse gases. Like most corporate taxes these days the tax ends up being pushed onto consumers, while the benefit of the tax is to support home upgrades to reduce energy usage for heating and cooling, the end result is a failure of it's promoted mission. From the presentation given, it was clear that TCI would do a similar thing by taxing those who import gasoline and diesel into the participating states which would then cause the price at the pump to increase. So the tax on the importers would be passed directly onto consumers. While the mission of TCI is commendable, to reduce the impacts of climate change in the transportation sector and to use the funds raised by the tax to support battery powered and other vehicle purchases by consumers to lower the amount of emissions from the transportation sector. This is an important goal to have and to realize. I am not convinced that creating a bureaucracy to increase taxes which may or not be successful in it's goals is the best solution. Are there alternatives to this approach that can have the same effects? A direct tax at the pumps that is designated for the support of transitioning our vehicle choices away from low mpg and high emissions ones? I am asking for a better and more well-thought out solution or an honest approach to the citizens of those states attempting to join this compact. This is a tax that will be directed onto consumers. Can we accomplish the same things with a direct tax on gasoline and diesel that is set aside in a fund to support this work? The gasoline and diesel market in our state is already a mess with prices much higher in the Chittenden County area even after the main owners of gas stations were sued by the state for price-fixing. Can we trust these people to not price fix when they are passing on a tax to us? A region-wide tax at the pump that is protected for its desired use is a much better way to accomplish our goals and doesn't try and pass off the plan as not a tax when it clearly is a direct tax to anyone who drives a vehicle.
Please oppose TCI until the plan is modified to be truthful to consumers and nullifies any possibility that the monopolies that already cheat consumers to do so in the name of minimizing the impacts of climate change. We must shift our transportation sector away from the use of fossil fuels which will not last forever and have negative impacts on our environment, TCI as it was laid out to the public is not the best way to do this. |
- |
|
12/22/2019 |
Terence |
Garvey |
N/A |
Tiverton |
Rhode Island |
Everyone knows that the money collected will not be applied to anything related to the environment and that this entire scheme is being pushed through to to compensate for the pathetic job of... read more Everyone knows that the money collected will not be applied to anything related to the environment and that this entire scheme is being pushed through to to compensate for the pathetic job of managing the state. |
- |
|
2/27/2020 |
Philip |
Dooley |
Dynage |
TOLLAND |
Connecticut |
Stop Global Warming NOW, or nothing else we do will matter.
Stop Global Warming NOW, or nothing else we do will matter.
|
- |
|
1/16/2020 |
Paul |
Heller |
Citizen |
Toms River |
New Jersey |
Clean mass transportation in various forms primarily railways are and have always been an affordable viable option to reduce pollution help clean the environment and lessen the affects of global... read more Clean mass transportation in various forms primarily railways are and have always been an affordable viable option to reduce pollution help clean the environment and lessen the affects of global warming
Please consider a strong effective transportation policy that would advance the aforementioned. The time for America to join the rest of the Democracy loving nations and be pro active if not the undisputed leader in the fight against climate change is Now. Thank you for your consideration.Paul Heller. |
- |